We have 398 entries displayed on 40 pages.
1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Next >
|
Last >>
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Kaylee_North_Dakota From: Kaylee_North_Dakota E-mail: h.agge.r.sto.n.per@gmail.com |
It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" — I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you — and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.
|
||
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Zoe_Indiana From: Zoe_Indiana E-mail: hag.gers.to.n.per@gmail.com |
Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.
|
||
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Jessica_Kansas From: Jessica_Kansas E-mail: h.ag.ge.rst.o.nper@gmail.com |
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate – McLame – would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.
|
||
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Nevaeh_Nebraska From: Nevaeh_Nebraska E-mail: ha.gg.er.s.to.n.per@gmail.com |
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*)
|
||
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: oipermlf From: bvfwghtc |
AUGMENTIN TABLETS FOR CHILDREN
|
||
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: jbpdhoia From: evdsldsv |
Simplicef Tabs Dogs
|
||
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Isabella_Alabama From: Isabella_Alabama E-mail: hagg.e.rs.t.o.npe.r@gmail.com |
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.
|
||
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Genesis_Maryland From: Genesis_Maryland E-mail: h.a.gg.e.r.s.t.on.p.e.r@gmail.com |
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.
|
||
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Sofia_Oregon From: Sofia_Oregon E-mail: h.ag.g.erst.o.nper@gmail.com |
Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What’s “fiscally conservative” about voting for every spending measure in sight?
|
||
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Kylie_Vermont From: Kylie_Vermont E-mail: h.agger.s.t.o.n.p.e.r@gmail.com |
That’s fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn’t matter.
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next > | Last >>
Powered by PHP guestbook 1.43 from PHPJunkyard - Free PHP scripts
